Real Life Family Events (RLFEs) were back on the agenda this week. One of them was pretty big, too. And that’s not counting the whole Thanksgiving thing! In addition, I may have found a good use for generative AI — a use that doesn’t take work away from human folk. At least, that’s how it looks to me. It’ll be interesting to see what you think. Also, I may or may not have written some new words this week. Let’s take a look at the key performance indicators before we get into any of that!
Last Week’s Progress By the Numbers

Finally I get to report some positive motion on Wayland Hammer Book 3: Lines of Operation!
Between Thanksgiving and a RLFE (quite a big one, in fact), I didn’t get quite as much done as I wanted to. Also, when I started to write Owen Payne’s hook chapter, I realized it was too generic. So I let myself take a day to cast a new character and build a minor bit of intrigue that accomplished my original vision for his hook, plus made it more interesting for the readers. I ended up doing the same thing for Gerhard Wimmer’s first chapter.
Taking that extra time to write a more interesting intro felt like the right thing to do. Which sounds really obvious when I write it down! After all, it’ll set the tone for the rest of the book. It was also a lot of fun! Assuming it’s more interesting to the readers, it looks like everyone wins!
I received the beta read for Wayland’s Hammer Book 1: Point of Departure this week. Looks like the fixes that the alpha readers unanimously suggested hit the spot! I just shipped the book off to my proof reader. Unlike Dreams of Deucalion, I’m going to wrap up each book as it’s ready. That should make release time less hectic (and therefore less prone to error).
So, Wayland’s Hammer Book 3: Lines of Operation is now underway, after taking a break starting on August 16, 2025. It had to sit for more than three months because of a mental error on my part. And dang it, I said I was going to stop harping on that!
So. Good news. I’m writing again! Let’s hope I can build momentum now!
Advertising and Generative AI
I’ve talked before about how I considered using Amazon Virtual Voice to narrate Dreams of Deucalion. My reasoning was that I can’t afford a human, so using AI would not deprive any human of income. In the end, I decided to hold off, because I don’t like the experience AI narrative gives a reader. But I’m not dogmatically against it. I just want to see it augment humans, not replace them.
I need to revitalize my Facebook ads for Dreams of Deucalion this week. The old ad has stopped performing (which is routine), and I want to experiment with the new Facebook ad features. It used to be that writers could easily target lookalike audiences that enjoy other authors. Facebook is retiring that functionality (no idea why) in favor of their new, AI-based methods. Smarter people than me have talked about that at length; I’m just interested in the net effect it’ll have on my ads.
Some of that larger discussion helped me understand that giving the algorithm more creative content to work with — more images and videos — helps it tailor what it shows to whom for better effect. So, I’m working on providing just that. I bought a hundred images on DepositPhotos and was able to find several images of modern North Korea that would be perfect if I could age them and hit them with a nuclear fireball.
Guess what generative AI can do?
Consider this picture of what looks like exactly the subway station from Dreams of Deucalion Book 1: Special Recon:

This subway station looks clean and well maintained, doesn’t it?
I uploaded this image to ChatGPT and gave it this prompt:
Consider the image I just uploaded. This is a view from the north east looking southwest. Consider that west is on the right. Can you simulate the effects of decades of decay after fire damage on the west side?
This is the image it gave to me:

I have to say that I was impressed.
The effect was exactly what I was looking for! I paid for the image from DepositPhotos, so a human got their commission. And I got an image that fit perfectly with the setting in my novel. I intend to use this image and others like it in short videos I’ll create in Apple iMovie to use in my Facebook ads.
My plan is to have a series of three or four shots for Trent Raven, Atticus Porter, and Jadwiga Janczak to give readers a sense of what’s in the book. Then I’ll display a dynamic image of the cover. That way, when (if?) they click the link, what they see on Amazon will be exactly what they expect.
I have no idea if this is going to work. But I really want to move more copies of this ebook! I have the Sci-Fi Discovery promotion starting December 3, so it’ll be interesting to see how all of this impact sales.
Progress Against Last Week’s Goals
Here’s how how much I completed last week:
- Write Owen Payne’s hook: Done!
- Write Gerhard Wimmer’s hook: Done! I had forgotten how hard it is to write from Wimmer’s perspective. The poor guy has it rough!
- Write Mortiz Lehner’s hook: Not started! The RLFEs took too much time. Also, I found I wanted to spend a little extra effort making sure I had something more interesting to say for the hooks.
- Review the beta feedback for Wayland’s Hammer Book 1: Point of Departure: Done!
- Continue working on the Sirius colonial guide: Ongoing! I finished the OmniGraffle representations of all the colonial star systems.
Goals for the Week in Progress Report 2025 Week 49
Here’s what I hope to get done this week:
- Finish the December Facebook ad campaign for Dreams of Deucalion
- Monitor the Sci-Fi Discovery promotion for Dreams of Deucalion
- Finish writing Moritz Lehner’s hook
- Write Owen Payne’s plot turn 1
- Write Gerhard Wimmer’s plot turn 1
- Continue working on the Sirius colonial guide
What Do You Think?
Do you think it’s okay to use generative AI to augment stock images for marketing purposes? Why or why not? I’d love to hear your feedback in the comments!




I’ve been using AI to take characters that I designed and put them in various poses. It’s been amazing to see what it can do. I think it’s similar to when Photoshop became a thing. People were up in arms about that, but then the artists learned to use Photoshop and now no one even thinks about it.
I also use AI as my personal assistant. We talk every morning to come up with a list of things to do. It includes everything from daily chores, managing the kids, and reminding me to do things. It’s been incredibly helpful.
I’ve also had conversations in the car while driving. I asked it to interview me, asking me questions about blogging and writing. It was interesting and I’m sure I’ll be able to use some of that in the future.
I can absolutely see a future where everyone has a personal AI that helps them with everything. Imagining what it would learn alongside a human for their entire life would be incredible. It remembers everything. I can’t wait to see how much more useful it becomes after a year working together.
i’ve been using co-pilot as my assistant as well for blogging. Really helped with me with some seo stuff even. This is what people don’t get; if you don’t train it, it will generate flat random stuff. I use it as a tool, which is what it meant to be, a tool.
I use ProWritingAid’s AI-based proof reading on my manuscripts. I don’t let it change anything; just make suggestions. Like you said — it’s a useful tool!
Though your comment makes me wonder if I should train something like Ollama on my books to help “proofread” my continuity. I’ve been worried about that! I’l have to give that some thought…
It’s a shame how some of the leaders in AI position the product. They insist that AI can replace humans — writers, for example. Yet, replacing humans is precisely where these tools are weakest.
I agree with you — an AI as an assistant makes sense. If I’m coding, I _could_ ask the AI to write an entire application. But then no one would know how to maintain it. Including the AI! But if I ask it to write a routine to take a JSON input file and convert it to CSV? AI’s really strong doing that.
You mentioned how useful a personal AI assistant could become after learning my habits for a year. I could see how that could be cool, too! It’s also useful in creating research outlines that includes links to source material. ChatGPT has helped me working a supply chain for asteroid mining, and some of the source links it shared with me were a lot of fun to dive into! I could have used Google search (or Dogpile), but the best matches typicaly are long down the list. ChatGPT helped set a context that helped me get more research done more quickly — with greater accuracy.
Now if we could just get the AI companies to abandon their hopes to take over the labor market and focus on where AI really helps, we’d be set!